Friday, January 3, 2025

"Psycho Killer, Qu'est-ce Que C'est: ‘Who Killed Teddy Bear’ and ‘Rat Fink’ as Forgotten Cinema Holy Grails"



Imagine the early 1960s—a cultural moment just before the free love explosions, while still simmering in the post-Eisenhower repression stew. In this vacuum exists two unholy grails of cinema: *Who Killed Teddy Bear?* and *Rat Fink*. These aren’t just movies—they’re gas leaks in the basement of the American psyche. And much like *Psycho* threw the innocent, white-picket-fence audience of 1960 into the blood-spattered shower, these films exist as warped reflections of a culture cracking under the weight of its own morality plays.


**"Who Killed Teddy Bear (1965): A Sleazy, Lurid Masterpiece of Urban Decay"**  

There’s something deeply unnerving about *Who Killed Teddy Bear*. Directed by Joseph Cates, this 1965 fever dream isn’t just a noir—it’s a sticky, claustrophobic descent into the psychosexual underbelly of mid-60s New York. It’s not a film; it’s a bruise. A slow, pulsing ache of a movie that clings to your skin long after the credits roll.  

The setup is deceptively simple: Sal Mineo plays Lawrence, a nightclub worker with a dark past and an even darker obsession with his co-worker Norah (Juliet Prowse). What starts as a tale of stalking quickly unravels into a lurid tapestry of voyeurism, trauma, and violence. But *Teddy Bear* isn’t interested in easy answers or moral clarity. It’s a film about looking—and being looked at—and the inherent violence of both.  

Sal Mineo is electric here, delivering a performance so raw it feels like a cry for help. His Lawrence is a predator, yes, but also a victim, consumed by his own compulsions and haunted by a past he can’t escape. Mineo plays him as both tragic and terrifying, a human embodiment of the film’s larger themes of guilt, repression, and desire. Juliet Prowse, meanwhile, radiates strength and vulnerability in equal measure, her Norah a rare example of a female character in noir who refuses to be just a victim or a femme fatale.  

But the real star of *Who Killed Teddy Bear* is the city itself. Cates captures mid-60s Manhattan in all its grimy, neon-lit glory, turning the city into a character as seedy and complicated as the people who inhabit it. The cinematography is stark and unflinching, lingering on the shadows, the sweat, the grime. This is New York as a labyrinth of back alleys, dive bars, and broken dreams—a place where the American Dream has gone to die.  

What makes *Who Killed Teddy Bear* so unforgettable is its refusal to look away. This is a film that stares unblinkingly into the abyss, forcing its audience to confront the ugliness lurking beneath the surface. It’s unrelentingly bleak, but there’s a strange beauty in its darkness—a kind of grim poetry that makes it impossible to look away.  

In today’s world, *Who Killed Teddy Bear* feels like a time capsule—a snapshot of a moment when cinema was beginning to grapple with the complexities of modern life and the messy, uncomfortable truths of human nature. It’s a film that challenges you, unsettles you, leaves you questioning not just the characters on screen, but yourself.  

*Who Killed Teddy Bear* doesn’t play by the rules. It doesn’t want you to feel good. It wants you to feel something—anything—and in that, it succeeds. This isn’t just a movie; it’s a cinematic confession, a howl of despair, a masterpiece of urban decay. You don’t watch it. You survive it.


"Rat Fink (1965): The Glorious, Chaotic Id of James Landis"

There’s something unhinged, something beautifully feral, about a film like Rat Fink. Directed by James Landis, this 1965 gem plays less like a conventional movie and more like a head-on collision between pulp fiction, midnight B-movie fever, and a skid-row manifesto against normalcy. It's not just a film; it’s a cracked mirror shoved in your face, daring you to laugh, wince, or walk away.

Rat Fink tells the story of a down-and-out nightclub singer (Schuyler Hayden) who becomes embroiled in a small-time crime spree that spirals into something far bigger—and far weirder—than anyone could have expected. The film’s moral compass isn’t just skewed; it’s missing altogether, and that’s part of the fun. This is cinema as anarchic free jazz, a crime drama that doesn’t bother with redemption arcs or tidy endings. Instead, Landis serves up a nihilistic carnival of violence, greed, and absurdity, punctuated by moments so bizarre they feel like fever dreams.

The characters are straight out of a pulp novel left in the sun too long: Hayden’s anti-hero is a walking contradiction, equal parts charming and sleazy, while his femme fatale companion (Judy Hughes) is all sharp edges and desperate survival instinct. The villains? Pure comic-book grotesques, as though Landis grabbed them from the panels of an underground zine and let them loose in 1960s Los Angeles.

What makes Rat Fink stand out isn’t its plot—it’s the tone, the texture, the grime that seeps out of every frame. Landis captures a seedy, low-budget aesthetic that feels almost punk-rock in its refusal to conform. The cinematography is raw and unfussy, the acting veers between campy and chilling, and the soundtrack feels like it was cobbled together in a back alley. This is filmmaking as rebellion, a middle finger to Hollywood’s polish and propriety.

But beneath the chaos, there’s something oddly prophetic about Rat Fink. It prefigures the rise of anti-heroes in American cinema, paving the way for the likes of Bonnie and Clyde and Easy Rider. At the same time, it holds up a warped funhouse mirror to 1960s culture, exposing the rot beneath the surface glitz. Landis may not have set out to make a masterpiece, but in his raw, unvarnished approach, he captured something essential about a society teetering on the brink of change.

Watching Rat Fink today feels like stumbling upon a forgotten relic of another era—a film that shouldn’t exist but somehow does, standing defiantly against the tide of mediocrity. This isn’t cinema for the faint of heart; it’s cinema for the restless, the weird, and the perpetually dissatisfied. James Landis didn’t just make a movie; he made a declaration of war on convention. And for that, we owe him a nod, a drink, and maybe a round of applause.


**Together: A Diagnosis of America**  
Taken together, these two films paint an accidental portrait of an America about to break. *Who Killed Teddy Bear?* shows the feverish, deviant underbelly of repression, while *Rat Fink* gleefully points a finger at the artifice of our escapist fantasies. Lester Bangs once said that good music rips out your guts and throws them back at you; the same is true here. These are not comfort films. They are agitation, irritation, and revelation.  

Forget your Criterion canon for a moment. Watch *Who Killed Teddy Bear* on Prime and *Rat Fink* on Tubi. Then ask yourself: what does the darkness want from me?

No comments:

Post a Comment